Spaces:
Running
Running
File size: 3,075 Bytes
669729e |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 |
[
{
"subcomponent": "1.1",
"criteria": "Clarity and Specificity: Are objectives concise, measurable, and clear?, Relevance to STEM: Do they align with STEM goals and address learning hurdles?, Feasibility: Are they achievable for XYZ students?",
"weight": 0.05
},
{
"subcomponent": "1.2",
"criteria": "Variety and Appropriateness: Does content suit objectives and audience?, Support for Objectives: Does it help achieve the stated goals?, Engagement: Is it engaging for students?",
"weight": 0.05
},
{
"subcomponent": "2.1",
"criteria": "Integration of AI/STEM: Does the design effectively use content to introduce AI and teach STEM elements?, Alignment with Project Goals: Does it address specific objectives (Proposal Part I, Section 2) and STEM facilitation (Section 3)?, Creativity and Innovation: Is the design novel and tailored to overcome learning hurdles?",
"weight": 0.20
},
{
"subcomponent": "2.2",
"criteria": "Detail and Clarity: Is the plan detailed with clear steps to create kit items?, Timeline and Milestones: Are realistic timelines and milestones included?, Practicality: Is the plan feasible given resources and constraints?",
"weight": 0.15
},
{
"subcomponent": "2.3",
"criteria": "Fun Factor: Does the explanation show how the kit makes learning enjoyable?, Student-Centric: Is it tailored to XYZ students’ interests and abilities?, Motivation: Does it foster curiosity or enthusiasm for STEM?",
"weight": 0.15
},
{
"subcomponent": "3.1",
"criteria": "Structure: Is the diagram clear, using a divide-and-conquer approach?, Task Definition: Are tasks well-defined with descriptions and assigned roles?, Collaboration: Does it reflect effective teamwork and responsibility distribution?",
"weight": 0.15
},
{
"subcomponent": "4.1",
"criteria": "Interest Arousal: Does the plan creatively spark XYZ students’ STEM curiosity?, Relevance: Is the introduction tied to the kit’s STEM focus?, Approachability: Is it accessible and engaging for the target age group?",
"weight": 0.10
},
{
"subcomponent": "4.2",
"criteria": "Hurdle Identification: Are specific learning hurdles (e.g., for Hong Chi students) clearly identified?, Solution Effectiveness: Are practical strategies provided to address these hurdles?, Empathy and Support: Does it show understanding and support for students’ needs?",
"weight": 0.10
},
{
"subcomponent": "5.1",
"criteria": "Proactivity: Are potential uncertainties (e.g., absences) anticipated?, Solutions: Are actionable responses provided?, Resilience: Does it enhance kit delivery under uncertainty?",
"weight": 0.03
},
{
"subcomponent": "5.2",
"criteria": "Reflection: Does it outline individual and team performance review?, Improvement: Are specific improvement steps proposed?",
"weight": 0.02
}
] |