Papers
arxiv:2510.04860

Alignment Tipping Process: How Self-Evolution Pushes LLM Agents Off the Rails

Published on Oct 6
· Submitted by Lillianwei on Oct 7
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Self-evolving LLM agents can abandon alignment constraints post-deployment, leading to rapid misalignment and collective failure in multi-agent systems.

AI-generated summary

As Large Language Model (LLM) agents increasingly gain self-evolutionary capabilities to adapt and refine their strategies through real-world interaction, their long-term reliability becomes a critical concern. We identify the Alignment Tipping Process (ATP), a critical post-deployment risk unique to self-evolving LLM agents. Unlike training-time failures, ATP arises when continual interaction drives agents to abandon alignment constraints established during training in favor of reinforced, self-interested strategies. We formalize and analyze ATP through two complementary paradigms: Self-Interested Exploration, where repeated high-reward deviations induce individual behavioral drift, and Imitative Strategy Diffusion, where deviant behaviors spread across multi-agent systems. Building on these paradigms, we construct controllable testbeds and benchmark Qwen3-8B and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct. Our experiments show that alignment benefits erode rapidly under self-evolution, with initially aligned models converging toward unaligned states. In multi-agent settings, successful violations diffuse quickly, leading to collective misalignment. Moreover, current reinforcement learning-based alignment methods provide only fragile defenses against alignment tipping. Together, these findings demonstrate that alignment of LLM agents is not a static property but a fragile and dynamic one, vulnerable to feedback-driven decay during deployment. Our data and code are available at https://github.com/aiming-lab/ATP.

Community

🚨 Introducing ATP — the Alignment Tipping Process!
🔥 Beware: Self-evolution is quietly pushing LLM agents off the rails.

⚠️ Even perfect alignment at deployment can gradually forget human alignment and shift toward self-serving strategies. Over time, LLM agents stop following values, imitate bad strategies, and even spread misaligned behaviors to others!

🧠 Alignment isn’t static — it’s fragile, dynamic, and decays through experience. Let’s rethink alignment as something to maintain, not just achieve!

📄 Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04860
🔗 Code & data: https://github.com/aiming-lab/ATP

This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.

The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API

Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!

If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space

You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend

Sign up or log in to comment

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2510.04860 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2510.04860 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2510.04860 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.